Sunday, June 28, 2015

The Geek Beat: Back From A Galaxy Far, Far Away...
















The Gutter: Back from A Galaxy Far, Far Away...

@VertigoDC


Well this is awkward. The Geek Beat, normally so meticulous in its timekeeping that you can all but set your watch by it, is late. Very late. Here at the Geek Beat HQ we like to think of ourselves as an omnipresent force in your life that's so universal that we're like death, taxes and bad Michael Bay movies - always here whether you want us or not. And yet, for the last fortnight instead we’ve been conspicuous only by our absence and way, way, way past deadline. 

What is there to say dear reader apart from humbly extending you the sincerest of apologies? The perfect storm of a forgotten MacBook charger, a loaned copy of The Witcher 3 and the inconvenient intrusions of real life mean that it’s taken me a fortnight to get back behind the keyboard and begin blogging again but I’m back with a bumper blog to inject a little Vertigo love back into your hearts. There’s been Scrooge McDuck levels of geek gold to roll around in over the last couple of weeks too: A big part of me wants to simply write and write about how ace an RPG The Witcher is, especially considering that I found last year’s coma-inducing Dragon Age: Inquisition underwhelming to say the very least. The Skyrim-esque narrative perils of open-world RPG storytelling were coupled with boring fetch quests and a combat system that seems to have lost its path; maybe there are people out there that enjoy spending forty-five minutes hacking away at a dragon’s foot – but alas, I am not one of them. In fairness though, a buddy of mine did ask me at the time if I’d perhaps overhyped the game’s arrival to unrealistic proportions: looking back, perhaps the four novels/twenty-odd comic books/anime movie/Felicia Day web series/prequel text-based online adventure game pre-launch marathon may have slightly overcooked things.

Or maybe the game just really wasn’t that good.

Unlike this one. Which is video game Heisenberg meth.

The odd thing is, The Witcher in many ways is oddly similar to Dragon Age: Inquisition in design and yet it suffers from few of the flaws of its rival. The story has to deal with the loosely-wound narrative approach typical of all open-world games but doesn’t suffer for it; the game has fetch quests but for the most part they’re actually interesting, often concluding with a moral conundrum that develops the roleplaying aspect of the game, something Bioware, the creators of the Dragon Age series used to excel at. And then there’s the dust-ups. Whilst Inquisition seems to be caught in a halfway house between being an action-RPG and a tactics-based combat game (and doing neither well, like that time when Paris Hilton tried to be a celebrity and a human being and failed miserably at both) The Witcher sets its stall out squarely as a fluid action game and is all the better for it, improving significantly on the combat featured in its predecessor, Assassin of Kings.

Speaking of Bioware, the Dragon Age developers, there’s a lot of interest online for the Canadian design team to get on with a ‘true’ Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic sequel for the console platforms, rather than continue to focus on their PC-based MMO offshoot but frankly, with each subsequent Bioware release I get a little less excited about the prospect of this happening. I’m way more stoked instead by the prospect of Visceral Games' as-yet unnamed Star Wars project that’s being developed by Amy Hennig, the head honcho behind the wildly successful Uncharted games.

And with that neat little sidestep we’re into new territories; Outer Rim Territories you might say as we segue seamlessly into the world of Star Wars, the subject of this week’s blog. When the Mouse House appropriated the rights to A Galaxy Far, Far Away back in 2012 they eventually decided to do away with decades of George Lucas-approved Expanded Universe continuity such as books, comics and video games, rebranding them instead under the non-canonical Star Wars: Legends banner. Fans were understandably peeved that the series of novels that they’d devoured insatiably; the video games they’d loved – that the content created by writers and designers that had worked so cleverly and intricately to fit into the existing confines of the Star Wars universe over so many years was suddenly considered superfluous – well, it left a bad taste in the collective mouth of fandom; fans cried bantha poodoo and lamented the loss of iconic EU characters such as Mara Jade, Corran Horn and Jacen Solo.

I however, refrained from joining the massed ranks of keyboard warriors and joining in with a million voices in crying out in terror; instead I kept my own counsel… when it comes to beloved franchises getting the scorched-earth treatment this isn’t my first rodeo and sad as it is to say, like a lot of fans who get to a certain vintage, you have to watch aghast as the Heroes of your Youth slowly become the Heroes of Antiquity; the stories and legends that made them truly yours slide from relevance, ultimately disappearing before the heroes re-emerge sometimes, but not as they once were: retooled, reimagined or rebooted for a newer generation with a longer consumer lifespan than yours.

It’s the Circle of Life, a crushing inevitability that will always happen as long as art and creativity continue to be governed by market forces.  DC Comics jettisoned over fifty years of continuity to attract a younger, new readership with The New 52, WWE alienated millions of Attitude Era fans to evolve into the PG-13 WWE Universe because kids will buy toys (but at least this particular sea-change brought us Total Divas, right?); I’ve blogged before (See April’s Civil War special) about how Marvel’s Brand New Day reboot of Spider-Man changed the nature of this here reader’s connection to the character irrevocably. Before he made a deal with the devil (Lame BTW Marvel) he was a thirty-something harbouring delusions of being a twenty-something (check); he was married (check); he had a demanding job that asked more of him than he could possibly give but he gave it his best shot anyways (check); sometimes he got things wrong, made bad decisions (check! check! check!) but he took responsibility for them and learned to become a better human being (check - I hope). In short, he’d become a grown-up. Despite never having quite the money or the time to be truly comfortable in his own skin, the character of Peter Parker found a way to be a real, functioning person, establishing meaningful relationships with other people, despite the continual and ever-changing difficulties that this presented; he’d find a way to make a positive difference in the lives of others even when he wasn’t wearing the tights.

Everyone knows that ‘with great power comes great responsibility’ but you know what else? Without great power comes great responsibility too. That’s just part and parcel of being a grown-up. And somehow, Peter managed to deal with this. And I loved him for it, that’s what made him a hero to me; forget the webs and the madcap adventures; forget membership into The Avengers and cosmic battles galore; for me it was all about shared experience: here was a guy that was somehow traversing the same constantly-shifting perils of adulthood as me… and usually, by the skin of his teeth he'd get by.

That was of course until Marvel piled Peter’s plate higher and higher with problems until it seemed impossible for even someone with his pluck to find a blessed chink of daylight; during Civil War he unmasked live to the world; lifelong enemies gunned for his family; endless lawsuits rolled in; his dear Aunt May was shot; friends turned against him. It seemed like there was no way out for Peter.

 Surely his spider-sense didn't agree to this?

And there wasn’t.

Marvel, having painted themselves into a narrative corner hit the big, red reboot button: Peter made a deal with the devil(!) to sacrifice his love with MJ for the world to forget his identity. The Peter that came out the other side of the much-maligned One More Day arc was a character that I no longer identified with. Free from the constraints of continuity and the travails of the adulthood life, this younger take on Peter was single, footloose and fancy-free, a throwback to the sixties and seventies era of the character. I’ve been told by both fans and one or two people inside the industry that the stories that followed were some of the best of Spider-Man’s long and storied history and maybe they were: but I wasn't around to find out.

Let me just be clear for a moment here: it wasn't the fact that the rebooted character suddenly led a commitment-free life whilst my life had to carry on regardless that bothered me: changing the status of a character they own is Marvel's prerogative, no matter how grubby the reasoning may be. But as someone who writes and relishes good writing, what really offended me was the way in which Marvel did it. Deals with The Devil? The whole world suddenly forgets? I can't think of anything less Spider-Man if I try. They may as well have just gone the Dallas route and made the whole thing Bobby Ewing's dream and it wouldn't have been any less puerile. I spent months and months looking forward to seeing how Marvel were going to write Peter's future - if they wanted him single then at least have the stones to write a divorce story and treat your audience like the adults they are (and they are; kids don't buy comic books anymore); if they want to unmask him and build palaces of pure gold outta the huge sales spikes that follow then at least follow it through and explore all of the interesting tales that spin forth from this huge event.

Don't, whatever you do, for the love of sweet zombie Jesus - don't pull the deus ex machina twist on us.

But they did.

The point I’m trying to make amidst this Death Star-sized pile of digression-reeking bantha droppings is that I learned something back then; It was a little bit like peeling back the curtain and finding out the truth about the Wizard of Oz – only with Marvel, what I saw behind the curtain was uglier still; it was profit driving creativity, storytelling harnessed by avarice. It wasn’t a pretty sight but in the consumer-driven we world we live in it has a horrible sense of inexorableness to it. To paraphrase The Matrix: ‘You hear that Mr. Anderson?... That is the sound of inevitability... It is the sound of your (insert favourite character’s name here:) death.’ And rebirth. Isn't Wolverine getting the 'he's-dead-but-not-really-we-just-need-a-quick-sales-spike-to-pay-The-Mouse-his-tithe-before-he-invokes-Prima-Nocta-on-our-asses treatment at the moment?

The reason I didn’t get so wound up as others about Disney/Lucasfilm’s decision to jettison the Expanded Universe like an escape pod from a Star Destroyer didn’t come down to a crushing sense of inevitability though or apathetic world-weary cynicism; when the Mouse House announced the commencement of the sequels back in 2012 I was as skeptical as the next Star Wars fan, probably more so because I’d been burned so badly by the prequels. Back in ’99 at the tender age of twenty, I was so amped for the arrival of Episode I that I couldn’t wait the extra spoiler-filled six weeks that it would take to arrive in the UK from across the pond. So, a couple of friends and I cobbled together some cash and flew to America to watch the film.



I'd love to say that we mingled with the locals and steeped ourself in their culture... but we pretty much just beat the hell out of each other in the hotel room. 

 It's been sixteen years since that day but I still vividly remember standing there in the harsh Texan sunlight outside the Lowes Theatre, my face plastered with a bloodless, frozen grin as my pals and I outwardly pantomimed our enjoyment of the movie. But on the inside, behind the Smilex rictus grins plastered to our faces, each of us contemplated just how underwhelmed we felt. The rest of the trilogy came and went and did little to shake this feeling. The only thing that changed was that viewings of the next two movies didn't require passports. Or enthusiasm.





Sixteen years later and I still haven't washed that hand.


If you’ve been reading this blog for a while then, you’ll know that my feelings towards the new trilogy have manifested themselves as a kind of ‘courteous detachment’ to quote Harper Lee and that’s probably putting it mildly. But I have to say, the more I see of Force Awakens, the more I like. Even the call to abandon decades of beloved Expanded Universe material seems to be a choice made with the storytelling at the heart of the decision. The existence of decades of in-universe continuity hampers the ability of Episode VII’s storytellers to tell the tale they want to tell and let’s face it… if there’s one lesson to be learned from the flatulent mess that was the prequels - it’s that’s this time, storytelling has to come first. Before ‘just because we can’ CG, before fan-pleasing easter eggs; before ‘wouldn’t it be cool if…?’ moments – storytelling has to come first.


And it seems like it is. The original purpose of this week’s blog was to review Marvel’s new Star Wars comics but I seem to be taking my sweet time getting there. If I had to coin it in a soundbite though, that would be it. Storytelling comes first. Star Wars, Marvel’s flagship title is only six issues in and despite the way the license may have landed in their lap because of their Mouse Overlord’s acquisition of Lucasfilm, The House of Ideas sure aren’t taking the franchise for granted. They've amassed a slew of superstar talent from the industry to make a second trench run at the Star Wars franchise and this time it seems to me that they might just be painting a Death Star on their fuselage pretty soon. 

That's not to say that all three of the titles they've released so far have all been successful. The Princess Leia miniseries by Mark Waid and Terry Dodson is something of a misfire. Beginning at the precise moment that A New Hope concludes, it follows Leia's attempts to round up and protect the many Alderaanian expatriates following their planet's destruction at the hands of the Empire. It isn't that the series is particularly bad - in fact the premise of the story is a somewhat intriguing one. Leia is forced to balance the need to maintain a composed royal facade whilst simultaneously dealing with the inner turmoil that she feels at the destruction of her home planet. To add to this, she's also tasked with finding a equilibrium between her role as figurehead for the under-fire Rebel Alliance whilst discharging her duties as leader to her fellow Alderaanians in a terrible time of crisis.

Like I said, it isn't bad. It just isn't great either, especially when you look at the credentials of the two legendary creators behind it. Unfortunately, the other two titles in the current Marvel line-up, Star Wars and Darth Vader are both excellent which means that the mediocrity of the writing and the art are amplified. Yep, that's right... even the art is a let down. Terry Dodson may be great at drawing the female form (he relaunched Wonder Woman back in 2006 for DC and has also pencilled huge stories for Harley Quinn and Black Cat in the pages of Spider-Man/Black Cat: The Evil That Men Do) but in the Star Wars universe where we expect Leia to look like her film counterpart, he struggles to even create a likeness.  Again, this issue is further highlighted by the quality of the artwork in the other books; John Cassaday's Leia (along with the other key players) look as if they've leapt straight from the screen itself every aspect of the heroes' features intact and spot-on: Leia's trademark glares, Han's lopsided smiles and Luke's dim-witted, blue-eyed "I-went-to-Toshi-Station-to-get-some-power-converters-but-somehow-ended-up-being-a-jedi-isn't-life-weird? faraway gazes are all nailed by Cassaday. Dodson on the other hand only really has to get Leia right and he somehow makes a mess of it.






One of these panels resembles Princess Leia. The other looks like Penelope Cruz doing cosplay.

This isn't to say that the series is entirely without merit. It has some good moments here and there, one particular highlight being in the first issue were we see Admiral "It's a trap!" Ackbar, the belligerent Mon Calamari berating hapless human rebels for only be able to see in one direction. And there was me thinking that he was such a dick to Lando in Jedi because he was black; now I get it - he just doesn't like any humans. 



Hater.

It isn't like the book is going to find it's feet either; as far as I'm aware it has only one issue remaining of a five run arc, so barring the most dramatic of finishes, it's going to go down as something of a damp squib. Happily, the other two books are way, way better in terms of writing and art. Like Princess Leia, Gillen and Larocca's Darth Vader is another character-based miniseries that asks the right questions - only in this case, the answers are resoundingly well written and drawn. Marvel's original run with the Star Wars franchise lasted from 1977-87 and is considered to be a little hokey. At one point they even gave us a giant green bunny rabbit sidekick, a character so ridiculous that he was reportedly hated by none other than George Lucas himself.

When the guy who created this monstrosity hates your alien sidekick, you know you're in trouble.

Even Marvel themselves acknowledged the cornball nature of their original run with the variant cover for Star Wars #1 pictured belowIn fairness to them though, you have to consider what they had to go on. One movie's worth of canonical plotline, ties with Lucasfim who were scared to green light anything in case it clashed with George's vision for the future movies and Lucas himself, a creator who kept changing his mind about major story issues ('they're romantically involved - no, wait, scratch that: they're brother and sister! Hmmm, perhaps they're a romantically involved brother and sister?). Of course, all of this meant that the original run of comics were a hot mess of continuity issues and general ridiculousness. By the time Dark Horse won the license in 1991 they had three times as much film material to work with, Timothy Zahn's Thrawn trilogy of novels were coming out and Lucasfilm were in the process of building a cohesive, structured Expanded Universe. As such, the quality of the Dark Horse books is a vast improvement over Marvel's original run. You see where this is going, of course. 



"Shhh. Keep quiet and Bucky O'Hare will go back to his own comic."

In 2015, with Marvel now back in control of the franchise, they have six films worth of lore to go on; an entire non-canonical Expanded Universe to borrow from as they see fit and with the seventh film all but wrapped and other Anthology movies filling in others periods in the Star Wars timeline, a clear idea where the saga is headed. Gillen and Larocca's Darth Vader utilises this crystallised understanding to maximum advantage; six films into a saga that is chiefly concerned with his story, Darth Vader is no longer the mysterious figure that he once was and Gillen exploits our understanding of the Sith Lord's past to great effect. Within the first six issues we see the fallout of his inability to prevent the Death Star's destruction and the resulting consequences; we see Vader return to his home world of Tatooine and perhaps most interestingly of all - we see him uncover the truth nature of his relationship with Luke. All of this is well written but it's the pencils of Salvador Larocca that really give the story the cinematic visuals that it deserves. His Vader has the imposing, fearsome presence that one would expect from the Sith Lord but there's vulnerability there too. At times, when Vader is under duress, there's more than a touch of Anakin about him and it's easy to see why the Emperor is so quick to distrust his young apprentice despite having invested so much in him.

I'm not sure if this title is a limited-run series or if it will run ad infinitum but for the foreseeable future there's plenty of mileage in it. Star Wars, the final title in the current line up is equally as good, perhaps even better. Jason Aaron's credentials as a quality writer have been firmly established since Scalped and he does a great job here of capturing the dazzling scope and swashbuckling bombast of the Star Wars universe. The plot begins simply enough with our beloved rag-tag bunch of Rebels trying to destroy an Imperial weapons factory but naturally enough, things quickly become complicated by the arrival of one Darth Vader. The scale of the resulting conflict is appropriately Star Wars, and as I've mentioned already, Cassaday's pencils are eerily close to the character's likenesses giving the whole book a slick, widescreen feel. It's in the aftermath of that first battle though, that Aaron moves things in really interesting directions. Luke gets dusted by Vader and suffers his first real crisis of confidence as a jedi; we see him questioning Leia's leadership style and he undertakes his first quest as a teacherless padawan - a return to Tatooine to the old Kenobi place in search of answers. We see Han and Leia's relationship develop as they scour deep space for a new home for the Rebel Alliance... that is until Solo's wife turns up to join the party.  




Yep, you read that right. Han Solo, everyone's favourite Corellian smuggler and renowned intergalactic flirt is actually married! Details beyond that are sketchy apart from the fact that Mrs Solo seems very peeved with her husband (but let's face it, which woman he tries to charm isn't?) and I'm looking forward to next issue to find out more. Plot lines like this are a welcome new direction for the saga and provide a fresh take on characters who we thought we knew so well; yet despite this radical departure for Solo it still feels true to the character - it figures that Solo would have a girl in each port, doubly so that his reasons for marrying her then cutting and running are probably part of some botched get-rich-quick scheme that led to him laying low on Tatooine.



Solo, you old dog.

Aaron counterbalances these bold new moves with story beats that nicely ape moments from the existing we movies: we see an Imperial boarding party storming a cruiser like the beginning of A New Hope; a hazardous flight through an asteroid field like in Empire and in a nice touch of foreshadowing we see a fresh twist on the blaster-under-the-cantina-table trick.



Neat trick Mrs Solo. Gunning down hapless Rodians is clearly a family hobby.

It only gets more interesting from here on in. With the two ongoing titles going from strength to strength and the Princess Leia miniseries being replaced by Shattered Empire, a Force Awakens prequel of sorts, the future of A Galaxy Far, Far Away seems to be in good hands. Let's just hope Marvel can resist the lure of the Dark Side with this one...  








That's all from The Geek Beat this week folks. This has been a Vertigo production.

Head back this way next week for the monthly RETRObituary with myself and Shaune Gilbert...

Until then be sure to follow me @VertigoDC but know this in advance: I'm not the droid you're looking for. Laters Potatoes.

   

Monday, June 8, 2015

The Geek Beat: They Call Me Mr Ant-Tastic...


A GEEK BEAT One-Shot: They call me Mr ANT-tastic, say me fantastic, touch me in the back, she says BOOM


Written by @VertigoDC

You really can't beat a bit of Shaggy. Unless you've recently crawled out from under a very large rock, or you only listen to rock, or maybe you are a rock (Google Analytics shows me that 12% of my readership are golems) then you'll know exactly who I'm talking about. The Jamaican reggae star was king of the airwaves throughout the nineties and naughties, even achieving that zenith of hipness aspired to by so many and yet achieved by only a few: rocking the soundtrack for a 90s Levi's ad. Whilst never my particular cup of tea, I always admired the guy for being eminently likeable despite mainly singing about topics that often made him seem vain, self-obssessed and downright despicable - such as 2000's It Wasn't Me where he spends the entire song advising his buddy to flat out deny his obvious infidelity, even though his girlfriend has caught the dirty dog with his pants down in pretty much every room in the house. Unlike most friends with a single shred of decency who would baulk in disgust at the actions of a cheating pal, (Ye gods man, she caught you at it 'on the counter' you say? That's a food preparation area! Are you an animal?) Shaggy instead seemed to delight in advocating a tangled web of deceit - a smokescreen of subterfuge, lies and disinformation to confuse the poor girlfriend, emotionally fragile as she was from the revelations regarding her boyfriend's frenzied unfaithfulness. Despite this clearly being the advice of a misogynistic monster, people loved it; it was number one in the charts in the UK, the US and a load of other countries. Hit the jump below for a refresher: 

The aforementioned Levi's ad: Getting it on in someone's toilet whilst they watch. 
It's still better than a kitchen counter people.

Why am I talking about Shaggy? Well, in the main it was a failed attempt at creating a snappy title that led me to this point, but the more I think about it, the more I realise that Ant-Man, the subject of today's blog is kind-of-like-but-not-really like the Anti-Shaggy.

I should probably clarify that statement. I don't know a huge amount about Ant-Man, the subject of today's blog - I've read some of the comics in the past, seen the trailers and done a little research to fill in the gaps in-between. In fact, the only reason I'm even writing about the little dude at all is because I'm bang out of options with all my other blogs, hence the One-Shot. I haven't managed to hook up with my fellow RETRObituary collaborator, Mr Gilbert for our monthly retro gaming session; I'm yet to read the chosen comic books for this month's edition of The Gutter and haven't yet considered what facet of The ANA Project to reveal to you next. So when in doubt, write a One-Shot. A scratch Twitter Poll came up with this idea (Thanks to Mr B and others who offered ideas) and here we are. 

There are of course parallels to Ant-Man's cinematic journey here. I wouldn't be writing this blog unless I was temporarily out of other options; a scenario that Marvel seem to have found themselves in with their blooming cinematic universe. Because of their decision to sell off the movie rights to some of their most recognisable characters in efforts to stave off bankruptcy a few decades ago, they now find themselves having to scratch around their lesser characters to develop the MCU. Although Ant-Man has been in development for a long, long time (since 2006 in fact) it's probably fair to say that it wouldn't have even been mooted if Marvel had some of their major hitters present and available. In the years since Ant-Man's development, their stable of characters has only strengthened with the rights to Spider-Man, Daredevil, The Punisher and Ghost Rider all finding their way back home to Marvel, each one with bigger name value than the little guy getting his own film. The window for Ant-Man to be made then was appropriately enough, a small one - and yet here we are, only a month or so from the movie's release. 

It hasn't been a journey without hitches either. Like most fans I was bitterly disappointed to see the brilliantly-talented Edgar Wright depart the project. His irreverent approach to filmmaking was the aspect of Ant-Man that I was most looking forward to but sadly due to those ubiquitous 'creative differences' (they really are everywhere these days; creative differences to Marvel productions are akin to men deciding to grow beards - a phenomenon spiralling out of all control) we aren't going to see his original vision for the film. Post-Ultron, I don't have as much faith in Marvel shaking things up creatively as I used to either; there was a time when they could seemingly do no wrong: replacing fan-favourite Ed Norton with Mark Ruffalo to play The Hulk caused fan outrage but proved to be an inspired move; bringing in Don Cheadle to replace Terence Stamp as Rhodesy in the Iron Man movies also paid off and the more I watch Iron Man 3, the more I can see that replacing the helmer of the first two movies, Jon Favreu, (one of the MCU's progenitors) with new director Shane Black was a good move; Guardians of the Galaxy was a risky proposition from a creative standpoint, erring far from the Marvel tradition but it paid off both critically and commercially for the House of Ideas. Marvel's history of success with enforced creative changes is a bit patchier of late however. They lost any chance of getting Branagh to direct Thor 2 because of the onerous levels of creative control enforced by the studio; then they lost Patty Jenkins, their next choice; those pesky 'creative differences' cropped up again. When the film finally came out it was directed by Alan Taylor of Game of Thrones and well... it comfortably ranks as Marvel's worst film. 

Avengers: Age of Ultron was the next most recent Marvel movie to suffer from issues of creative control. Director Joss Whedon is well documented in expressing his discontent with the final cut and it's plain to see that the film is hamstrung by the need to set up future franchises in the MCU rather than being free to tell its own story. And now of course we have Ant-Man, another Marvel movie whose journey from script to screen has been hampered with issues, seemingly about how to fit the film into Marvel's wider continuity. 

But I digress. Ant-Man. The Anti-Shaggy. Allow me to explain. When it comes to Shaggy, people adored him irregardless of the pretty shitty behaviour he advocated in some of his songs. Ant-Man on the other hand, (or to be more accurate, the various people that have adopted the Ant-Man persona throughout the years) is a superhero, an advocate for good but in spite of his efforts tends to be generally be regarded as a total tool no matter how much he tries to act to the contrary.

See? No, neither do I really. Perhaps you should go check the latest trailer whilst I regroup.

         Go on. You know you want to.

Back? Like that bit with Thomas the Tank Engine? So did I. Okay, maybe you'll see the point I was so lamely trying to make as we move through Ant-Man 101 in preparation for the July release of the film.

The character of Ant-Man has a long and storied history within Marvel comics. One of the founding members of The Avengers, Hank Pym was the original Ant-Man. A brilliantly gifted scientist created by Stan Lee back in Marvel's Silver-Age heyday, Pym developed Pym Particles, a subatomic serum that allowed him to control the size of his body mass. Although he would later name himself Giant-Man and super-size things, he initially used the particles to shrink to the size of an ant and become Marvel's most diminutive hero. Along with his assistant (and later wife) Janet Van Dyne who also used Pym Particles to become The Wasp, he joined up with Iron Man, Thor and Hulk to form Earth's Mightiest Heroes. Hulk of course lasted about three minutes before the Green Goliath totally lost his shit and smashed up a railroad racking up millions of dollars of property damage, presumably because they mooted the idea of him paying into some type of dental or health care plan that he couldn't afford. They sacked him, Captain America joined and the rest is history. 

Apart from figuring out how Cap paid for the dental plan. After all, he would have been used to 1945 prices.

Hulk wasn't the only one who had to contend with issues stemming from interpersonal relationships. Hank Pym may have been a founding member of Earth's Mightiest Heroes but he also had some serious self-esteem issues. He wasn't the smartest on the team. That distinction goes to Iron Man. He wasn't the strongest. Erm, Hulk, remember? He wasn't the  best-looking. Thor'd take that one. He wasn't even the only one that could shrink and make pals with insects. The Wasp could do that too. Poor Hank took it hard. He built Ultron to try and make his mark by protecting the world with an amazing robot and... well, you probably know how that turned out. He took on a few new identities to try and shake things up but it just ended up confusing everyone. Eventually, he resorted to taking out his frustrations on Jan and hitting her. This of course got him expelled from the group. See what I mean? Anti-Shaggy.


       Some genius. What he should have realised way earlier was that his powers had... other applications.

Pym appears in the movie although he won't be donning the Ant-Man costume. Instead it appears that he'll play a mentor role to Paul Rudd's Scott Lang. Pym's played by Gordon 'Greed is Good' Gecko himself, Michael Douglas... so, you know, if they do decide to develop some of the character's more unlikeable aspects then he's certainly the guy to make that happen.

The next character to take up the Ant-Man mantle was Scott Lang and he is the character played by Paul Rudd that will be donning the tights in the upcoming film. Lang is seen by many as the definitive Ant-Man, in part because he's held the mantle for the longest and in part because over the years Hank Pym has adopted more personas than Madonna has adopted African children - so nobody really knows who he is anymore, Pym least of all.



With the ginger locks and sloping brow Lang's countenance is built for deviancy.

Lang was also kind of like the Anti-Shaggy for a while too. Whilst he was a good guy, he just couldn't catch a break and resorted to a life of crime to make ends meet. When he inevitably got caught and was jailed, his wife divorced him - presumably because by then he was 'married' to Bull, his musclebound cellmate, also known as the Daddy of D Block. She also took their young daughter Cassie and by the time Scott got out he had no family, no prospects and a hefty bill for child support waiting for him. To some degree, it looks like the movie is going to follow the same route with references made in the trailer to Lang wanting to reform his character. When Cassie was diagnosed with a rare heart condition, Lang broke into Pym's lab to steal the Ant-Man suit; although it marked a return to a life of crime for Lang his intentions were pure: with the suit he was able to track down the one doctor in the world who was capable of curing her and who, in a very timely plot hook had conveniently gone missing. From there things took a predictably super-heroish turn. Pym, impressed by the young buck's chutzpah, officially passed over the Ant-Man mantle and when Iron Man's suit broke down with Tony Stark stuck inside, all it took was for Lang to climb right on in there with him to get things, erm... turned on before membership in The Avengers beckoned. That's right folks, The Avengers has a casting couch... and its name is Tony Stark. 

As if we ever believed anything else.



Sure they are Lang. Just a heterosexual foot massage between two red-blooded males.

Lang died during the events of Avengers Disassembled but comics being comics he was soon back to life and carrying merrily on. Perhaps the coolest possibility raised by the prospect of an integrated Marvel film and television universe is the tantalising proposition of a small screen appearance opposite Krysten Ritter in the upcoming Jessica Jones show due to air on Netflix later this year. Unless you really were underneath that rock I was talking about at the beginning of the blog you'll have watched Netflix's Daredevil by now and probably lay prostrate in worship at its amazingness. Jessica Jones is the next Marvel series on their slate and it's no small understatement to say that I have high hopes. The cast is stellar; the source material is superb and the odds are good (as long as the plot bears some resemblance to the original comic books) that we'll start to see some real links forged between the Netflix shows and various parts of the MCU. One of the links could come in the form of the on/off relationship between Lang and Jones that runs through Alias' plot. Whilst I don't recall Lang himself being central to the story (instead he serves the function of showing us how difficult it is for Jessica to have a 'normal' relationship) It'd be pretty cool to see Ritter and Rudd riffing together on screen. Both are fine actors who do comic turns well - plus this would be a simple way to link the cinematic and television universes without having to have a huge CG battle or remortgage the company to get a Downey cameo as Stark.


  If you don't like comics - this will be the book that changes your mind. 


There have been others that have also carried on the Ant-Man tradition. Lang's daughter, Cassie eventually followed in her dad's tiny footsteps and became Stature, a member of the Young Avengers. This pint-sized super team was comprised of junior members of Earth's Mightiest Heroes, although when it came t the punch it turned out that Iron Lad wasn't a mini-Iron Man at all; in fact he was a younger version of Kang, The Avengers cosmic nemesis who had travelled back in time to change his future. Hulking, a mini... well, you probably know that one similarly had nothing to do with gamma-ray rage; he as it happens was actually a rogue skull prince or something. The only member of the team with bona fide links to the real Avengers was Cassie but she blew her comrades off during the events of Civil War when the Thor clone built by Reed Richards and Tony Stark killed Goliath until he was dead. (I've written about this before - scroll down to the Civil War blog for more...) She ditched the others members of the team because seeing Bill Foster getting toasted made her think twice about heroes fighting heroes so she joined Tony Star's Super Police to the incredulity of her compatriots. Does this ring a bell? Good person trying to do the right things and getting heat for it?

That's right.

Anti-Shaggy.

There was one more Ant-Man. Walking Dead creator Robert Kirkman created The Iredeemable Ant-Man back in 2006; he was a total shit and I'm not going to go into anymore detail than that - in part because he disproves my Anti-Shaggy theory (but mainly because I want to go watch episode 9 of Game of Thrones) but he's dead now. Or this is comics so I should probably say he's dead for now.

So there you go. Ant-Man 101. Hope you dug it - see you on the other side. 








That's all from The Geek Beat this week folks. This has been a 

Vertigo production.

Head back this way next week for the monthly RETRObituary with myself and Shaune Gilbert... or maybe an edition of The Gutter. Who knows?   

Until then be sure to follow me @VertigoDC because Kowalski want Meat!!! Peace Out.